OPT 17-month Extension Court Challenge Fails

We wrote in June about the lawsuit challenging the 17-month OPT extension for STEM students.  The lawsuit was brought by  the Immigration Reform Law Institute, joined by the Programmers Guild and other organizations.   The lawsuit challenged the administration’s decision to extend the work period for students under the OPT program and argued that the OPT extension is just a way to go around the H-1B cap limit.  The argument was based on the fact that the H-1B program, and its annual cap, is set by U.S. Congress and by extending the OPT by 17-month, the administration has circumvented the required process of consent by the U.S. Congress.

There is a disposition in this case favorable to the F-1 and OPT holders who may benefit from the 17-month extension. In an opinion dated August 5, 2008, the US District Court for the District of New Jersey denied the request for preliminary injunction to stop the OPT 17-month program.

By | Last Updated: August 19th, 2008| Categories: News|

About the Author: Dimo Michailov

Dimo Michailov
Dimo has over 15 years of experience in US immigration including employment-based immigration benefits, corporate compliance and family based immigration. He represents corporate and individual clients in a wide range of cross-border immigration matters including mobility of key foreign executives and managers, specialized knowledge workers, and foreign nationals with extraordinary ability.

The Capitol Immigration Law Group has been serving the business community for over 15 years and is one of the most widely respected immigration law firms focused solely on U.S. employment-based immigration.   Disclaimer:  we make all efforts to provide timely and accurate information; however, the information in this article may become outdated or may not be applicable to a specific set of facts.  It is not to be construed as legal advice.