EB-5 Processing Statistics for I-526 and I-829 Petitions
USCIS has released an updated set of processing statistics for petitions filed under the fifth employment-based preference category (EB-5) for foreign investors. It is interesting to note that the number of I-526 applications (for initial EB-5 green card) have more than doubled compared to 2010 (4,156 compared to 1,955) while the approval rate has remained fairly steady at around 80%. The rate of I-829 filings (application to remove condition) have dropped off at 546 (compared to 2,345 and 768 for the previous two years). The approval rate for I-829 has remained steady at around 90%.
Detailed EB-2 Processing Statistics
In addition to the general summary of EB-5 processing data, the report provides a breakdown of the receipts, approvals and denials all the way back to 2005, broken down by quarter. It is interesting to note the trend of increasing I-526 filings starting approximately in 2008-2009, when the recession started. For example, the current rate of I-526 filings has quadrupled in comparison to 2008 or 2009, while the approval rate has remained steady. At the same time, when seen in conjunction with the I-829 (removal of condition) processing data, we see a high rate of I-829 filings in 2011 to early 2012, with a dropoff over the past two quarters of 2012.
Regional Center Applications
USCIS has released some information on the applications for a “regional center” certification. In 2012, there were approximately 50-60 regional center applications in each of the first three quarters. So far in 2012, there were only 30 regional center applications approved (with the remaining applications under review currently).
Related News and Articles
The Capitol Immigration Law Group has been serving the business community for over 15 years and is one of the most widely respected immigration law firms focused solely on U.S. employment-based immigration. Disclaimer: we make all efforts to provide timely and accurate information; however, the information in this article may become outdated or may not be applicable to a specific set of facts. It is not to be construed as legal advice.