July 2013 Visa Bulletin – EB-2 India Remains Unchanged at September 1, 2004; Significant Forward Movement in EB-3
The U.S. State Department has just released the July 2013 Visa Bulletin which is the tenth Visa Bulletin for the FY2013 fiscal year. The major headline in the upcoming month’s Visa Bulletin is the lack of movement (again) in EB-2 India and the very significant forward movement in the EB-3 category for most countries (with the exception of India and Philippines which moved very slightly forward).
Summary of the July 2013 Visa Bulletin – Employment-Based (EB)
Below is a summary of the July 2013 Visa Bulletin with respect to employment-based petitions:
- EB-1 remains current across the board.
- EB-2 for ROW, Mexico and Philippines are all current. EB-2 India remains unchanged, again, at (the severely retrogressed) September 1, 2004. EB-2 China moves forward by three (3) weeks to August 8, 2008.
- EB-3 ROW, China and Mexico move forward by four (4) months to January 1, 2009. EB-3 Philippines moves forward by only one (1) week to October 1, 2006, while EB-3 India moves forward by only two (2) weeks to January 22, 2003.
- The “other worker” category moves forward by four (4) months for ROW and Mexico to January 1, 2009. It moves forward by one (1) week to October 1, 2006 for Philippines and moves forward by five (5) months to March 22, 2004 for China. It moves forward by two (2) weeks for India to January 22, 2003.
Summary of the July 2013 Visa Bulletin – Family-Based (FB)
Below is a summary of the July 2013 Visa Bulletin with respect to family-based petitions:
- FB-1 continues to move forward, although slowly. FB-1 ROW, China and India all move forward by five (5) weeks to June 1, 2006. FB-1 Mexico moves forward by only one (1) week to August 22, 1993 and FB-1 Philippines moves forward by six (6) months to July 1, 2000.
- FB-2A moves forward by four (4) months to October 8, 2011 for ROW, China, India, and Philippines. FB-2A Mexico moves forward by almost (4) months to September 1, 2011.
- FB-2B ROW, China and India all move forward by almost (4) months to November 1, 2005. FB-2B Mexico moves forward by four and a half (4.5) months to November 1, 1993 while FB-2B Philippines moves forward by seven (7) weeks to December 22, 2002.
Again: No Progress in EB-2 India – Confirms Our Expectations for a Very Slow Forward Movement in the Future?
Unfortunately, the July 2013 Visa Bulletin does not bring any news for us to report in connection with EB-2 India. This category has been stuck at September 1, 2004 since the October 2012 Visa Bulletin. Yes, we realize we are repeating what we have been reporting over the past several months, but again this month the EB-2 India cutoff dates remain unchanged. We are into the last quarter of the fiscal year, and the continued lack of any movement in EB-2 India this month is a strong indication that there is simply too high of a demand in the EB-2 India category and that the Department of State would move the cutoff dates forward very slowly in order to allow USCIS to approve the (high) number of EB-2 cases filed and pending.
We invite you to subscribe to our free weekly immigration newsletter to receive timely updates on this and related topics. We also invite you to contact us if our office can be of any assistance in your immigration matters or you have any questions or comments about the July 2013 Visa Bulletin. Finally, if you already haven’t, please consider our Visa Bulletin Predictions tool which provides personalized predictions and charts helping you understand when a particular priority date may become current and what are the movement patterns.
Related News and Articles
The Capitol Immigration Law Group has been serving the business community for over 15 years and is one of the most widely respected immigration law firms focused solely on U.S. employment-based immigration. Disclaimer: we make all efforts to provide timely and accurate information; however, the information in this article may become outdated or may not be applicable to a specific set of facts. It is not to be construed as legal advice.